Charles Evans Hughes had two careers on the Court and a monumental one in between. Born in 1862, a brilliant New York lawyer and reform governor, he was appointed an Associate Justice in 1910 — then resigned in 1916 to run for president as the Republican nominee, losing to Woodrow Wilson by a hair. He served as Warren Harding's secretary of state, sat on the Permanent Court of International Justice at The Hague, and in 1930 returned to the Court as its eleventh Chief Justice, one of the very few to leave the bench and come back to lead it.
Hughes led the Court through its gravest modern crisis, the constitutional collision with the New Deal. Early on his Court struck down key recovery programs, and in 1937 a re-elected Franklin Roosevelt moved to 'pack' it with additional justices. Hughes helped defeat the plan — quietly, with a devastating letter to the Senate — while the Court, in the 'switch in time that saved nine,' began upholding economic regulation: minimum-wage laws in West Coast Hotel and the Wagner Act in NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin, ending the Lochner era. A firm defender of civil liberties, he had already written Near v. Minnesota, the landmark against prior restraints on the press. Commanding, impartial, and famously efficient, Hughes was among the greatest administrators ever to lead the Court. He retired in 1941.
Near v. Minnesota
1931 · 5–4Holding · Government may almost never impose a prior restraint forbidding publication; a law authorizing courts to shut down 'malicious' newspapers is unconstitutional.
Role · Hughes wrote for the Court.
The foundational free-press decision against prior restraint, later decisive in the Pentagon Papers case.
Read the opinion →West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
1937 · 5–4Holding · A state minimum-wage law for women does not violate 'liberty of contract'; the Constitution permits reasonable economic regulation.
Role · Hughes wrote for the Court.
The 'switch in time' — the case that ended the Lochner era of judicial hostility to economic regulation and cleared the way for the modern regulatory state.
Read the opinion →NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
1937 · 5–4Holding · Congress may regulate labor relations in manufacturing under the Commerce Clause because industrial strife affects interstate commerce.
Role · Hughes wrote for the Court.
Upheld the Wagner Act and vastly expanded federal commerce power — a constitutional cornerstone of the New Deal order.
Read the opinion →Charles Evans Hughes is the only man to sit on the Court twice — associate justice from 1910 to 1916, then Chief Justice of the United States from 1930 to 1941 — and between those tenures he ran the whole American century in miniature: reforming governor of New York, the 1916 Republican nominee who nearly beat Woodrow Wilson, secretary of state, judge of the World Court. As Chief he steered the Court through the constitutional crisis of the New Deal, wrote the free-press landmark Near v. Minnesota, and cast the pivotal votes of 1937 that ended the Lochner era. Merlo Pusey's two-volume life won the Pulitzer Prize and remains the standard; start there, read Near and West Coast Hotel, and set him in the constitutional revolution he presided over.
The Bookshelf
The standard biography, and a deserving winner of the 1952 Pulitzer Prize. Pusey — a Washington Post editorialist who had Hughes's cooperation and his papers — tells the whole improbable arc across two volumes: the Baptist minister's prodigy son; the New York lawyer whose insurance and utility investigations made him governor; the associate justice who resigned in 1916 to run for president and lost California, and the White House, by fewer than four thousand votes; the secretary of state of the disarmament era; and the return to the center chair in 1930. It is admiring and a little stately, but thorough, fair, and superbly documented — the essential life, and the place any serious reading of Hughes begins. Macmillan, two volumes.
The best book on the epic of 1937, told as a dual biography of the two men at its center. James Simon — who has written parallel studies of Jefferson and Marshall, Lincoln and Taney — sets Roosevelt's assault on the Court against Hughes's cool defense of it, and makes the court-packing fight a genuine constitutional drama. The liveliest way into Hughes's second tenure. Simon & Schuster.
The compact one-volume life, in Little, Brown's Library of American Biography, by the diplomatic historian Dexter Perkins. Less exhaustive than Pusey but shrewd on Hughes as a type — the high-minded Republican statesman — and the best short introduction to the whole career. Little, Brown.
The study of Hughes the diplomat — his years as Harding and Coolidge's Secretary of State, the Washington Naval Conference, and the 'illusions' Glad argues shaped an idealistic American approach to a dangerous world. The standard account of the great career between his two turns on the Court. University of Illinois Press.
The scholarly study of the launching pad — Hughes's rise from the gas and insurance investigations that made his name to two terms as a progressive Republican governor of New York, battling his own party's machine. The fullest account of the reformer before the robes. Cornell University Press.
The standard study of Hughes the jurist — Samuel Hendel's analysis of the constitutional record across both tenures, from the Progressive-era associate justice to the Chief who steered the Court through 1937. The book for the jurisprudence that the biographies narrate. King's Crown Press.
The best account of the 1937 crisis Hughes had to manage — the collision between Roosevelt's New Deal and the Four Horsemen, the court-packing plan, and the sudden shift of doctrine that made the plan unnecessary. Leuchtenburg, the leading historian of the era, is superb on Hughes's generalship: the Chief Justice's public letter that helped sink the packing plan, the timing of West Coast Hotel and Jones & Laughlin, and the question historians still argue — whether the 'switch' was principle, politics, or coincidence. The indispensable setting for Hughes's second tenure. Oxford University Press.
Hughes in his own words — the candid notes he wrote for his family, edited by David Danelski and Joseph Tulchin, covering the whole career with the reticence and precision that were his hallmark. The essential primary source, and the documentary spine of Pusey's biography. Harvard University Press.
Hughes's own book on the institution he would soon lead again — the Columbia lectures he gave in the interval between his two tenures, a lucid insider's account of the Court's history, methods, and self-inflicted wounds (Dred Scott, the Legal Tender reversal). Quietly prophetic, given the crisis that awaited him in 1937. Columbia University Press.
Hughes's greatest opinion, and one of the foundation stones of the First Amendment. A Minnesota law let the state padlock a scandal sheet as a 'public nuisance'; Hughes held for a 5–4 Court that this was a prior restraint on the press, and that the central purpose of the free-press guarantee is to bar exactly such advance censorship. The doctrine of Near — that the government may almost never stop publication before the fact — runs straight to the Pentagon Papers case forty years later. A landmark, and free online.
The opinion that buried the Lochner era. Upholding a state minimum-wage law for women, Hughes wrote for the Court that liberty of contract is not absolute and that the Constitution permits reasonable regulation in the public interest — overruling Adkins v. Children's Hospital and abandoning forty years of judicial resistance to economic legislation. Handed down in the middle of Franklin Roosevelt's court-packing fight, it was the heart of the 'switch in time,' the moment the constitutional revolution turned. Read it against Peckham's Lochner (§56). Free online.
A quiet crack in the wall of segregation. Hughes wrote for the Court that Missouri, which had no law school for Black students, could not satisfy 'separate but equal' by paying Lloyd Gaines's tuition to study out of state — it had to provide an equal facility within the state. A narrow ruling, but the first of the NAACP's graduate-education victories that Thurgood Marshall (§96) would build, step by step, into Brown. Free online.
The first comprehensive Hughes biography in over seventy years — since Pusey won the Pulitzer in 1952. Reitano's Hughes is the great structural reformer of the Progressive age: investigator, governor, justice, presidential nominee, Secretary of State, and the Chief Justice who steered the Court through the New Deal storm. The modern one-volume life this shelf has waited decades for. University Press of Kansas.
The Holmes Devise volume on Hughes's chief justiceship — the fullest scholarly account of the Court that faced down FDR, absorbed the constitutional revolution of 1937, and invented modern rights jurisprudence in footnote four. The institutional companion to the biographies. Cambridge University Press.
The Reading Path
A researched route through the literature — in order.
- 1.Pusey, volume one — for the rise — prodigy, investigator, governor, the 1916 campaign
- 2.Near v. Minnesota — for his greatest opinion and the birth of the no-prior-restraint rule
- 3.West Coast Hotel v. Parrish — for the end of the Lochner era and the switch of 1937
- 4.Leuchtenburg, The Supreme Court Reborn — for the court-packing crisis he steered the Court through
- 5.Pusey, volume two — for the diplomacy, the World Court, and the second tenure whole
Where the Papers Are Kept
The Charles Evans Hughes papers at the Library of Congress are large and rich — correspondence, court files, and the autobiographical notes Pusey drew on — spanning the governorship, the State Department, and both tenures on the Court. One of the fuller justice collections. Visit →
Online Resources
Ideas for Further Research
- The two tenures. Hughes is the only justice to leave the Court and return — an associate justice who resigned to run for president, then came back fourteen years later as Chief. Compare the two Hugheses: the cautious Progressive of 1910–1916 and the embattled Chief of the New Deal. What did the years as governor, candidate, and secretary of state teach him about leading a Court under political fire?
- The switch in time. West Coast Hotel and NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin, both in the spring of 1937, abandoned the Court's war on economic regulation just as Roosevelt moved to pack the bench. Historians still divide over whether Hughes and Roberts (§74) switched from conviction or calculation. Lay out the evidence — the conference dates, the pending packing plan, Hughes's own account — and weigh the two stories.
- The administrator. Hughes ran the Court with famous efficiency and wrote the public letter that helped defeat the packing plan by showing the Court was abreast of its work. Set him beside the other great managerial Chiefs — Taft (§69), who rebuilt the Court's machinery, and later Warren (§88) — and ask what the job of Chief Justice actually is. CJ line: Taft §69 → Hughes → Stone §73.